竞争与垄断的效率再比较—张伯伦与罗宾逊夫人市场结构与厂商均衡理论的修正及其产业政策价值
首发时间:2008-08-05
摘要:在对张伯伦和罗宾逊夫人市场结构和厂商均衡理论系列缺陷进行分析和重新设定现实性分析前提假设基础上,本文运用静态和动态均衡方法对其进行了必要修正,得出如下结论:从静态角度看,完全竞争总非最有效率市场结构,适度竞争才是最有效率市场结构,在特定情况下适度竞争表现为完全垄断;从动态角度看,资本密集型行业市场会迅速向垄断演进,劳动密集型行业市场会缓慢向垄断演进,整个国民经济体系呈现由竞争向垄断的不断演进趋势。基于该结论,政府应同时采取支持中小企业做大规模的兼并政策和重在反市场垄断行为与反行政垄断结构的反垄断政策。
For information in English, please click here
The Comparison between Competition and Monopoly—Amendment of Market Structure and Firm Equilibrium Theory of Chamberlin and Robinson and Its Value for Industrial Policy
Abstract:Based on the criticism upon a series of defects of market structure and firm equilibrium theory of Chamberlin and Robinson and the resetting of practical premises, with the help of stationary equilibrium and dynamic equilibrium, the paper amends the market structure and firm equilibrium theory, reaching a conclusion as follows: From the static perspective, the best market structural form is not perfect competition but moderate competition. In specific instance, the moderate competition behaves as absolute monopoly; From the dynamic perspective, capital–intensive industries will quickly evolve to monopoly, and labor–intensive industries will come to oligopoly with a comparatively slow space. As a result, there is an evolutionary trend from competition to monopoly in national economy system. Based upon this conclusion, the government have to apply anti–monopoly policy which emphasizes being against actions of market monopoly and structures of administrative monopoly and merger policy sustaining medium and small enterprises in magnifying their scale.
Keywords: Market Structure Firm Equilibrium Model Amendment Industry Policy
基金:
论文图表:
引用
No.2324078741121792****
同行评议
共计0人参与
勘误表
竞争与垄断的效率再比较—张伯伦与罗宾逊夫人市场结构与厂商均衡理论的修正及其产业政策价值
评论
全部评论0/1000