基于不同质地土壤粒度测试方法的评定
首发时间:2016-05-19
摘要:土壤的粒度组成是土壤的基本物理属性之一,传统的土壤粒度分析方法有移液管法和密度计法,激光粒度仪法是近年来新兴的粒度分析方法。然而,这三种方法由于其测试原理的差异导致其测试结果存在定性及定量的差异。本研究选取粉质亚砂土、粉质亚粘土两种不同质地土壤,通过系列室内颗粒分析试验,描述了密度计法与移液管法及激光法的粒径分布曲线特征,并讨论了三者之间的差异,结果表明:1)测试结果上,三种测试方法对于粉质亚粘土和粉质亚砂土两种不同质地土壤,粒径在2-0.05mm范围内时测试结果均无显著差异。粒径<0.05mm时,粉质亚粘土移液管法和密度计法测试结果没有显著差异,且显著高于激光;粉质亚砂土测试结果则为移液管法最高、密度计法次之、激光法最低。2)在准确度上,三种粒度分析方法中激光法精密度最高,移液管法次之,密度计法最低。3)激光法与吸<0.05mm两个粒级的回归方程建立转化关系。?????
关键词: 粒径分布 激光法 密度计法 湿筛-移液管法 方法评定?????
For information in English, please click here
Evaluation of method of soil particle size distribution for the different soil texture
Abstract:The particle-size composition is a basic soil physical property. Sieve-pipette method and Hydrometer method are the traditional approach to analyze the soil particle-size composition. The laser diffraction method is a new analysis instrument in recent years. However, due to the differences in the test principle, there are differences among the results of the three different method. This paper took two different texture of soil to study the discrepancy of the three methods mentioned above. It shows that:1)The precision shows that: the laser diffraction method is the best, the second is the pipette method and hydrometer method is the worst.2)The differences of the test results show that: when measuring particle 2-0.5mm, there now significant difference of the results among three methods for the two texture of soil; when it comes to <0.05mm particle size, for silty loam,the results from laser diffraction method are lower than the other two method, but no difference between this two methods;while for silty sand,the content result from Sieve- pipette is the highest, the hydrometer method is the second and the laser diffraction method id the lowest. 3) The laser diffraction measured results of different texture soil particle size distribution could be converted by the linear regression equation of following tow particles grades including 2-0.05mm and <0.05mm.
Keywords: Particle size distribution(PSD) Laser diffraction method Hydrometer method Sieve-pipette metod Method evaluation
论文图表:
引用
No.4686843114429214****
同行评议
共计0人参与
勘误表
基于不同质地土壤粒度测试方法的评定
评论
全部评论0/1000