可重复使用包装差别定价策略研究
首发时间:2018-05-17
摘要:近几年来,政府和企业越来越关注包装的回收再利用,而如何制定合理的回收价是包装循环系统中至关重要的问题。本文结合可重复使用包装的特点,基于折旧理论,重点考虑了旧包装的质量状况、已使用年数等对包装的回收定价的影响,提出了旧包装回收的差别定价策略。此外,本文对比分析了差别定价模式下,包装发货方与收货方集中决策与分散决策(斯塔克尔伯格博弈)时的回收价、回收量和供应链的经济收益等,得出了如下结论:1.只有当包装价值达到一定值时,包装回收才具有可行性,并且,包装价值越高,系统收益越大。2.相比分散决策,集中决策模式下,包装的回收价格更高,回收量更大、终端客户和供应链的整体收益更大。3.无论在哪种模式下,包装回收价格总与质量系数、包装价值和客户对回收价格的敏感程度正相关,与包装的已使用年数和客户的环保意识负相关。
For information in English, please click here
Research on differential pricing strategy for reusable packages
Abstract:These years, governments and enterprises are paying more attention to reusing packages, and how to make reasonable returning prices has become a significant problem. Based on the theory of the depreciation and the characteristics of reusable packages, this paper analyzed how the quality status and the years packages have been utilized impact the returning pricing. Thereafter, considering differential pricing, this paper compared the returning prices, the returned quantity and the total economic incomes of the supply chain when centralized and decentralized (Stackelberg Game) decisions are made respectively. And the following conclusions are drawn: 1. Only when the value of packages amounts a certain value is the returning the packages feasible. And the higher the value, the more economic incomes will be created. 2. Comparing with decentralized decision-making, centralized decision-making can increase the returning prices, enlarge the returned quantity and create more economic value. 3. Under both situation, the returning price is always positively related to the quality coefficient, the value of packages and the sensitivity of customer toward returning price, while negatively associated to the years packages have been utilized and the environmental awareness of customers.
Keywords: game theory reusable packages differential pricing quality coefficient
基金:
引用
No.****
动态公开评议
共计0人参与
勘误表
可重复使用包装差别定价策略研究
评论
全部评论0/1000