对华反补贴案件实证分析与统计分析
首发时间:2018-05-09
摘要:以2004年至2015年为研究时间线,主要针对美国、欧盟、澳大利亚和加拿大这四个国家或组织发起的对华反补贴案件,并对案件中的被诉理由进行统计分析,获得对华反补贴发起理由的重点要件。并利用申诉年前后3年共计7年的贸易数据进行实证分析,证实反补贴的发起存在对两国贸易的破坏效应。而根据中国入世时签订的入世后第15年自动获取市场经济国家地位的条款,2016年正是这一条款自动生效的时间点,然而西方主流国家依然拒绝承认这一条款,因此反补贴贸易措施必然并长期存在,且有愈演愈烈的态势。在这样的形势下,对反补贴及其效应的研究仍有不小的价值。
For information in English, please click here
Empirical analysis and statistical analysis of anti-subsidy cases in China
Abstract: Based on the countervailing case happened in 2004 to 2015 ,this article mainly focuses on the United States, the European Union, Australia and Canada, which are the main countries or organizations who launch anti-subsidy cases against China. With the analysis of the alleged reasons used to initiate a countervailing case, We can get the key reason why China was easy to attacked by the countervailing. Moreover, empirical analysis was made on the trade data of three years before and after the appeal year, confirming the existence of the destruction effect on the trade between the two countries owing to countervailing. And according to China\'s accession to the WTO which signed that after 15 years, China will get the terms of the market economy status automatically. And 2016 was the deadline. However, mainstream western countries still refuses to acknowledge this clause, countervailing will exist for a long time, and has intensified. In such a situation, the research on countervailing and its effects is of great value.
Keywords: trade economy countervailing non-market economical country countervailing investigation items
基金:
引用
No.****
动态公开评议
共计0人参与
勘误表
对华反补贴案件实证分析与统计分析
评论
全部评论0/1000