月经周期中情绪冲突Stroop效应研究
首发时间:2018-12-14
摘要:本文研究的目的是探讨月经周期不同时相(卵泡期和黄体期)对情绪冲突的影响。研究采用被试内三因素重复测量设计的词-面孔Stroop任务,分析比较了16名被试在卵泡期和黄体期完成情绪辨别任务中的正确率和反应时。结果发现:情绪冲突的Stroop效应显著(P<0.01),当词和面孔类型效价一致时,被试的反应时更短,正确率更高;月经时相的主效应显著(P<0.01),女性在黄体期比卵泡期的反应时更长,正确率更低;月经时相和情绪面孔类型交互作用显著(P<0.05)。上述分析表明,月经周期对情绪冲突Stroop效应的影响显著,女性在黄体期较卵泡期表现出更为明显的情绪Stroop效应;与愉快面孔刺激相比,被试在月经周期各时相对于愤怒面孔的注意偏向更为明显。
关键词: 月经周期 Stroop效应 词-面孔任务 情绪冲突
For information in English, please click here
Research on the Emotional Conflict Stroop Effect in Menstrual Cycle
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different phases of menstrual cycle (follicular phase and luteal phase) on emotional conflict. In this study, the word-face Stroop task was designed by repeating the measurement of three factors in the subjects. The accuracy and response rate of 16 subjects in emotional discrimination tasks were compared between the follicular phase and luteal phase. The results showed that the Stroop effect of emotional conflict was significant (P<0.01). When word and face type had the same valence, the subjects\' response time was shorter and the accuracy rate was higher. The main effect of menstrual phase was significant (P<0.01), and women\'s response time in luteal phase was longer than that in follicular phase, and the accuracy rate was lower. The interaction between menstrual phase and emotional face type was significant (P<0.05).The above analysis shows that menstrual cycle has a significant impact on the Stroop effect of emotional conflict. Women show a more obvious emotional Stroop effect in luteal phase than in follicular phase. Compared with the pleasant faces, the attention preference of the subjects was more obvious at each menstrual cycle than that of the angry faces.
Keywords: menstrual cycle Stroop effect word-face task emotional conflict
引用
No.****
动态公开评议
共计0人参与
勘误表
月经周期中情绪冲突Stroop效应研究
评论
全部评论0/1000