基于默契共谋的质量水平差异对供应链的影响
首发时间:2020-11-20
摘要:对于共谋问题,较多文献集中于研究不同供应链渠道下的共谋差异,而忽视了供应链结构中基本元素的变化规律。在本文中,笔者就一对一供应链渠道默契共谋中产品质量水平差异对供应链的影响进行了深入研究。基于消费者具有质量消费倾向的条件,采用Nash博弈和Stackelberg博弈相结合的方法展开分析。结果显示,共谋行为导致两个产品的质量水平趋于接近的可能性极大,进而成为市场中的可替代品或互补品;两制造商在做质量决策时,对对方的产品质量水平的变化更为敏感;相对于高质量制造商来说,低质量制造商在不同的共谋条件下对产品的产品质量水平的变化更加敏感。另外,针对不同的决策场景,笔者绘制出供应链利润随着质量差异的变化趋势图,据此可以得到每一种供应链结构下,不同质量水平差异时,利润最大化的决策形式。该论文对不同质量水平差异的供应链领域的共谋行为及决策研究具有重要的意义。
For information in English, please click here
The impact of quality level differences based on tacit collusion on the supply chain
Abstract:Regarding the problem of collusion, many literatures focus on the study of the differences of collusion under different supply chain channels, while ignoring the changing laws of basic elements in the supply chain structure. In this paper, the author conducts an in-depth study on the impact of product quality level differences on the supply chain in tacit collusion of one-to-one supply chain channel. Based on the condition that consumers have a quality consumption tendency, the analysis is carried out by a combination of Nash game and Stackelberg game. The results show that the collusion behavior will cause the quality levels of the two products to be close to each other, resulting them become substitutes or complementary products in the market. When the two manufacturers make quality decisions, they are more sensitive to the product quality level of the counterpart. Compared with high-quality manufacturers, low-quality manufacturers are more sensitive to changes in product quality under different collusion conditions. In addition, for different decision-making scenarios, the author draws a trend chart of supply chain profit changes with quality differences. Based on this, we can obtain the decision-making form of profit maximization under each supply chain structure and different quality levels. This paper is of great significance to the research of collusion behavior and decision-making in the supply chain field with different quality levels.
Keywords: Collusion Pricing Decision Equilibrium Sensitivity Analysis: Quality Level Difference
基金:
引用
No.****
动态公开评议
共计0人参与
勘误表
基于默契共谋的质量水平差异对供应链的影响
评论
全部评论0/1000