In this study, 26plex Y-STRs typing system, including 17 Y-STRs (DYS19, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS385ab, DYS437, DYS438, DYS439, DYS448, DYS456, DYS458, DYS635 and GATA H4) recommended as YHRD standard loci and nine new highly discriminating Y-STRs (DYS549, DYS643, DYS388, DYS570, DYS533, DYS576, DYS460, DYS481 and DYS449), was established with 5-dye fluorescences labelling. Developmental validation indicated that the 26plex Y-STRs typing system was reproducible, accurate, sensitive and robust. The sensitivity of the system was such that a full profile was obtainable even with 125 pg of male DNA. Specificity testing was demonstrated by the lack of cross-reactivity with a variety of commonly encountered animal species and bacteria. Also, the multiplex is suitable for mixture study. An average of above 97% of the minor alleles detected with the male/male mixture with 1:3 and 3:1 ratios, while an average of above 70% of the minor alleles detected with the male/male mixture with 1:19 and 19:1 ratios. Full profiles are consistently detected with 125 pg of male DNA, even in the presence of excessive amounts of female DNA. In addition, the whole PCR amplification of the 26 Y-STRs can finish in 1 h, making the multiplex system suitable for fast-detection. For the forensic evaluation of the multiplex system, 516 haplotypes were found among 517 unrelated males. HD of the multiplex system was 0.9999925 while DC was 0.9980658, which is suitable for forensic application.

In this study, a new STR 25-plex typing system, including 23 autosomal STRs (D1S1656, D2S1338, D2S441, D3S1358, D5S818, D6S1043, D7S820, D8S1179, D10S1248, D12S391, D13S317, D16S539, D18S51, D19S433, D21S11, D22S1045, CSF1PO, FGA, Penta D, Penta E, TH01, TPOX, vWA) and a Y-STR locus of DYS391 and amelogenin, was developed. The included 24 STRs belonged to the main international DNA databases (CODIS, ISSL, ESS-extended, UCL, GCL and NCIDD) except D6S1043 (specially chosen for Chinese population). Developmental validation indicated that the STR 25-plex typing system was reproducible, accurate, sensitive and robust. The sensitivity testing of the system was such that a full profile was obtainable even with 125 pg of human DNA. Specificity testing was demonstrated by the lack of cross-reactivity with a variety of commonly encountered animal species and microbial pool. For the stability testing, full profiles can been obtained with humic acid concentration ≤ 60 ng/μL and hematin < 500 μM. Also, this multiplex system is suitable for mixture study. All of the minor alleles were called for ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1 of the mixture with the system. In addition, the whole PCR amplification can finish within 1 h, making the system suitable for fast-detection. For the forensic evaluation of the multiplex system, 23 autosomal STRs included followed the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. A total of 268 alleles were detected for the 23 autosomal STR loci among 200 individuals. Since 23 autosomal STRs were independent from each other, CMECduo was 0.99999916563607 and CMECtri was 0.99999999986525. All the forensic efficiency parameters demonstrated that this multiplex system is highly polymorphic and informative in the Han population of China.

Utilizing massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technology for SNP testing in forensic genetics is becoming attractive because of the shortcomings of STR markers, such as their high mutation rates and disadvantages associated with the current PCR-CE method as well as its limitations regarding multiplex capabilities. MPS offers the potential to genotype hundreds to thousands of SNPs from multiple samples in a single experimental run. In this study, we designed a customized SNP panel that includes 273 forensically relevant identity SNPs chosen from SNPforID, IISNP, and the HapMap database as well as previously related studies and evaluated the levels of genotyping precision, sequence coverage, sensitivity and SNP performance using the Ion Torrent PGM. In a concordant study of the custom MPS-SNP panel, only four MPS callings were missing due to coverage reads that were too low (<20), whereas the others were fully concordant with Sanger's sequencing results across the two control samples, that is, 9947A and 9948. The analyses indicated a balanced coverage among the included loci, with the exception of the 16 SNPs that were used to detect an inconsistent allele balance and/or lower coverage reads among 50 tested individuals from the Chinese HAN population and the above controls. With the exception of the 16 poorly performing SNPs, the sequence coverage obtained was extensive for the bulk of the SNPs, and only three Y-SNPs (rs16980601, rs11096432, rs3900) showed a mean coverage below 1000. Analyses of the dilution series of control DNA 9948 yielded reproducible results down to 1 ng of DNA input. In addition, we provide an analysis tool for automated data quality control and genotyping checks, and we conclude that the SNP targets are polymorphic and independent in the Chinese HAN population. In summary, the evaluation of the sensitivity, accuracy and genotyping performance provides strong support for the application of MPS technology in forensic SNP analysis, and the assay offers a straightforward sample-to-genotype workflow that could be beneficial in forensic casework with respect to both individual identification and complex kinship issues.

Interpreting mixed DNA samples containing material from multiple contributors has long been considered a major challenge in forensic casework, especially when encountering low-template DNA (LT-DNA) or high-order mixtures that may involve missing alleles (dropout) and unrelated alleles (drop-in), among others. In the last decades, extraordinary progress has been made in the analysis of mixed DNA samples, which has led to increasing attention to this research field. The advent of new methods for the separation and extraction of DNA from mixtures, novel or jointly applied genetic markers for detection and reliable interpretation approaches for estimating the weight of evidence, as well as the powerful massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technology, has greatly extended the range of mixed samples that can be correctly analyzed. Here, we summarized the investigative approaches and progress in the field of forensic DNA mixture analysis, hoping to provide some assistance to forensic practitioners and to promote further development involving this issue.

Human identification and paternity testing are usually based on the study of STRs depending on their particular characteristics in the forensic investigation. In this paper, we developed a sensitive genotyping system, SiFaSTR™ 23‐plex, which is able to characterize 18 expanded Combined DNA Index System STRs (D3S1358, D5S818, D2S1338, TPOX, CSF1PO, TH01, vWA, D7S820, D21S11, D10S1248, D8S1179, D1S1656, D18S51, D12S391, D19S433, D16S539, D13S317, and FGA), three highly polymorphic STRs among Chinese people (Penta D, Penta E, and D6S1043), one Y‐chromosome Indel and amelogenin using a multiplex PCR; the PCR amplified products were analyzed using the Applied Biosystems 3500 Genetic Analyzer. Full genotyping profiles were obtained using only 31.25 pg of control DNA; various case‐type specimens, as well as ten‐year‐old samples were also successfully genotyped. Additionally, in the validation studies, this multiplex was demonstrated to be human‐specific and compatible with the interference of multiple PCR inhibitors. The system also enabled the detection of mixtures, and complete profiles could be obtained at the mixed ratios of 1:1, 1:3, and 3:1. The development and validation study here illustrated that the SiFaSTR™ 23‐plex system is accurate, powerful, and more sensitive than many other systems. What's more, the population data in our study not only illustrated that this 23‐plex typing system was straightforward and efficient but also expanded the Chinese STR database, which could facilitate the appropriate application of the 23 genetic markers in forensic genetics, especially in the Chinese population.