Small interfering RNA (siRNA) is normally designed to silence preselected known genes. Such selections are inevitably prone to bias as a result of limited knowledge about the biological process, transcript identity, and functions. A library that contains all permutations of siRNA could avoid such problems. In this paper, it is shown that 5×107 siRNA-encoding plasmids can be constructed in a single tube by using vectors with two mutated RNA polymerase III promoters arranged in a convergent manner. Such a library was used to carry out genomewide screening of functional genes in a phenotype-driven manner. Multiple siRNAs that induce a significant increase of cell proliferation speed were identified.

We have evaluated antisense design and efficacy of locked nucleic acid (LNA) and DNA oligonucleotide (ON) mix-mers targeting the conserved HIV-1 dimerization initiation site (DIS). LNA is a high affinity nucleotide analog, nuclease resistant and elicits minimal toxicity. We show that inclusion of LNA bases in antisense ONs augments the interference of HIV-1 genome dimerization. We also demonstrate the concomitant RNase H activation by six consecutive DNA bases in an LNA/DNA mix-mer. We show ON uptake via receptor-mediated transfection of a human T-cell line in which the mix-mers subsequently inhibit replication of a clinical HIV-1 isolate. Thus, the technique of LNA/DNA mix-mer antisense ONs targeting the conserved HIV-1 DIS region may provide a strategy to prevent HIV-1 assembly in the clinic.

Only a small fraction of all siRNAs are effective in silencing their target genes, and siRNA efficacy can only be determined experimentally. Previously described reporter-based siRNA validation methods all rely on the availability of physical cDNA clones, and this limits the high throughput applicability of the method. In the current report, we used short synthetic DNA fragment containing a siRNA targeting site, instead of cDNA, to fuse with a reporter gene. When targeting such transcripts with different siRNAs, we found that such constructs can faithfully report the efficacy of the corresponding siRNAs in a sequence specific manner, even when the inserted DNA fragment is essentially only long enough to cover the targeting site. The efficacy of both vector-based siRNA and synthetic siRNA can be evaluated using this system. Since only readily available short synthetic DNA fragments are needed for forming the evaluation vector, this method provides an appealing way of validating siRNAs in high throughput.

The concept of small interfering RNA (siRNA) has been extended to include not only short double-stranded RNA of 19-25 bp, but also single-stranded antisense RNA of the same length, since such single-stranded antisense siRNAs were recently found to be able to inhibit gene expression as well. We made comprehensive comparison of double- and single-stranded siRNA functions in RNA interference (RNAi), targeting multiple sites and different mRNAs, measuring RNAi effects at different time-points and in different cell lines, and examining response curves. Duplex siRNAs were found to be more potent than single-stranded antisense siRNAs. This was verified by the observation that single-stranded antisense siRNAs, which were inefficient in some cases when used alone, could be rescued from inefficiency by sequentially transfecting with the sense siRNAs. This result suggests that the structural character of siRNA molecules might be a more important determinant of siRNA efficiency than the cellular persistence of them.

Antisense DNA target sites can be selected by the accessibility of the mRNA target. It remains unknown whether a mRNA site that is accessible to an antisense DNA is also a good candidate target site for a siRNA. Here, we reported a parallel analysis of 12 pairs of antisense DNAs and siRNA duplexes for their potency to inhibit reporter luciferase activity in mammalian cells, both of the antisense DNA and siRNA agents in a pair being directed to same site in the mRNA. Five siRNAs and two antisense DNAs turned out to be effective, but the sites targeted by those effective siRNAs and antisense DNAs did not overlap. Our results indicated that effective antisense DNAs and siRNAs have different preferences for target sites in the mRNA.