基于RTK模式、航高与控制点数量的无人机航摄精度分析
首发时间:2024-03-15
摘要:如何优化无人机航摄方案以获得较高精度的测图成果对于行业应用至关重要。在总结众多影响因素的基础上,选取RTK (Real-Time Kinematic)模式、航高以及控制点数量3个代表性因素进行无人机航摄精度影响分析。利用大疆公司最新推出的Mavic 3行业无人机,在两种RTK模式下分别进行了4个航高共8个架次的飞行试验,采用5种不同数量的控制点布设方式,通过大疆智图平台实现了40类航摄成果的输出,最后基于检查点实测坐标对比并分析各类航摄成果的精度差异。结果表明:(1) 无人机航高与成果影像分辨率之间具有极好的相关性,据此建立了有/无RTK模式不同控制点数量下的实际影像分辨率与航高之间的转换公式,可基于应用需求对航高或成果分辨率实现预估。(2) 在RTK模式下无论是否添加控制点,航摄影像的平面位置精度和高程精度均随航高的增加而降低;在无RTK模式免像控条件下,航摄影像的平面位置均方根误差(Root Mean Square Error, RMSE)整体上随航高的增加呈增大趋势,而高程RMSE随航高的增加而降低。在添加适量控制点后,无RTK模式下航摄影像的平面位置精度和高程精度均随航高的增加呈降低趋势。(3) 相同航高时,是否添加控制点及其数量变化对RTK模式下的航摄精度提升效果并不明显,但能极大影响无RTK模式下的航摄精度,即航摄影像的平面位置RMSE和高程RMSE均随控制点数量的增加先迅速降低而后趋于稳定。然而,无论RTK开启与否,控制点过量均不利于航摄成果精度的提升。(4) 无人机在RTK模式免像控条件下的成图精度达到了与无RTK模式有像控条件下的同等精度水平,故在合适条件下基于RTK无人机执行航摄任务时无需布设控制点。在此基础上,总结了无人机航摄方案优化建议,可为相关应用提供参考。
关键词: 无人机 精度 RTK 航高 控制点 Mavic 3
For information in English, please click here
Accuracy analysis of UAV aerial photogrammetry based on RTK mode, flight height, and number of GCPs
Abstract:How to optimize the UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) aerial photogrammetry scheme to obtain high-precision mapping results is crucial for industrial applications. Based on the summary of many influencing factors, three representative factors, namely RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) mode, flight altitude, and the number of GCPs (Ground Control Points), were selected to analyze the impact of UAV aerial photogrammetry accuracy. Using the latest Mavic 3 industrial UAV launched by DJI, four flight altitude tests with eight sorties were conducted under two RTK modes. The output of 40 aerial photogrammetric results was realized through the DJI Terra platform using five different GCP layout methods. Finally, based on the measured coordinates of CPs(Check Points), the accuracy differences of various aerial photogrammetric results were analyzed. The results showed that: (1) There is a perfect correlation between the flight altitude and the resolution of the UAV aerial photogrammet- ric results. Based on this, conversion formulas were established between the actual image resolution and the flight altitude under different GCP numbers in both RTK and non-RTK modes, which can be used to estimate the flight altitude or resulting image resolution based on application requirements. (2) In RTK mode, regardless of whether GCPs are added, the aerial photogrammetric image\'s horizontal and vertical accuracy decreases with increasing flight altitude. In the non-RTK mode without GCPs, the aerial photogrammetric image\'s horizontal RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) generally increases with increasing flight altitude. At the same time, the vertical RMSE decreases with increasing flight altitude. After adding an appropriate number of GCPs, the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the aerial photogrammetric image decreases with increasing flight altitude innon-RTK mode. (3) When the flight altitude is the same, whether to add GCPs and their number changes have no significant effect on the improvement of the accuracy of aerial photography under RTK mode but can significantly affect the accuracy of aerial photography under the non-RTK mode, that is, the horizontal RMSE and vertical RMSE of the aerial photogrammetric image both decrease rapidly with increasing GCP number before stabilizing. However, whether RTK is turned on or not, excessive GCPs are not conducive to improving the accuracy of aerial photography results. (4) The mapping accuracy of the UAV under RTK mode without GCPs reaches the same level as that under non-RTK mode with GCPs. Therefore, deploying GCPs when performing aerial photography tasks based on the RTK-UAV is unnecessary under appropriate conditions. On this basis, suggestions for optimizing the UAV aerial photogrammetry scheme were summarized, which can provide a reference for related applications.
Keywords: UAV, accuracy, RTK, flight altitude, ground control points, Mavic 3
引用
No.****
同行评议
共计0人参与
勘误表
基于RTK模式、航高与控制点数量的无人机航摄精度分析
评论
全部评论0/1000