Signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) is a regulator of transcription for interleukin-4 (IL-4)-induced genes. The ability of STAT6 to activate transcription depends on functional interaction with other transcription factors and coactivators. We have characterized the mechanism of STAT6-mediated transcriptional activation by identifying STAT6 transcription activation domain (TAD) interacting nuclear proteins. The first of the identified proteins was coactivator protein p100, which regulates IL-4-induced transcription by connecting STAT6 with other transcriptional regulators. Here, we describe RNA helicase A (RHA) as a novel component of STAT6 transcriptosome. In vitro and in vivo experiments indicated that RHA did not directly interact with STAT6, but p100 protein was found to mediate the assembly of the ternary complex of STAT6-p100-RHA. In chromatin immunoprecipitation studies RHA together with p100 enhanced the binding of STAT6 on the human Ig« promoter after IL-4 stimulation. RHA enhanced the IL-4-induced transcription, and the participation of RHA in IL-4-regulated transcription was supported by RNAi experiments. Our results suggest that RHA has an important role in the assembly of STAT6 transcriptosome. As RHA is also known to interact with chromatin modifying proteins, the RHA containing protein complexes may facilitate the entry of transcriptional apparatus to the IL-4 responsive promoters.

induced genes. Activation of gene expression involves recruitment of coactivator proteins that function as bridging factors connecting sequence-specific transcription factors to the basal transcription machinery, and as chromatin-modifying enzymes. Coactivator proteins CBP/p300 have been implicated in regulation of transcription in all STATs. CBP is also required for STAT6-mediated gene activation, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are still elusive. In this study we investigated the mechanisms by which STAT6 recruits CBP and chromatin-modifying activities to the promoter. Our results indicate that while STAT1-interacted directly with CBP, the interaction between STAT6 and CBP was found to be mediated through p100 protein, a coactivator protein that has previously been shown to stimulate the transcription of IL-4-induced genes. The staphylococcal nuclease-like (SN)-domains of p100 directly interacted with amino acids 1099–1758 of CBP, while p100 did not associate with SRC-1, another coactivator of STAT6. p100 was found to recruit histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity to STAT6 in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies demonstrated that p100 increases the STAT6-p100-CBP ternary complex formation in the human Ig promoter. p100 also increased the amount of acetylated histone H4 at the Ig promoter, and siRNAs directed against p100 effectively inhibited Ig reporter gene expression. Our results suggest that p100 has an important role in the assembly of STAT6 transcriptosome, and that p100 stimulates IL-4-dependent transcription by mediating interaction between STAT6 and CBP and recruiting chromatin modifying activities to STAT6-responsive promoters.

The high-af®nity receptor for IgG (FcgRI) is a myeloid cell-speci®c and IFN-g-induced gene, and thereby serves as a paradigm for cytokine-induced cell type-speci®c gene responses. The expression of FcgRI is regulated by PU.1 and Stat1 transcription factors. We established an experimental model to analyze the individual functions of Stat1 and PU.1 in cytokine-induced transcription of the natural FcgRI promoter in U3A cells lacking both factors. PU.1 was required for both the basal activity and for the IFN-g-induced FcgRI promoter activation, while Stat1 alone could not initiate transcription. In contrast, in the context of a heterologous promoter, PU.1 inhibited the Stat1-mediated transcription. Systematic analysis of Stat1 and PU.1 mutants and FcgRI promoter elements revealed that activation of the promoter required the DNA binding, and the transactivation functions of both Stat1 and PU.1. PU.1 and Stat1 bound the promoter elements independently, and no physical interaction between the proteins was observed. The requirement of PU.1 for FcgRI promoter activity was supported by demonstration of in vitro interaction between PU.1 and components of the basal transcription machinery TBP and RNA polymerase II. Deletion of the acidic transactivation domain of PU.1 greatly diminished both the FcgRI promoter activity as well as the interaction with RNA polymerase II. In contrast, Stat1 did not interact with TBP or RNA polymerase II. These results de®ne functional cooperativity between PU.1 and Stat1 in FcgRI promoter activation where PU.1 serves as an ampli®er and bridging factor with the basal transcription machinery.