During October 1999 to November 2000, 98 blood culture specimens from the same number of febrile episodes originating from 49 patients with haematological malignancies were examined for the presence of eubacteria and fungi based on 16S rRNA gene and the 5.8, 18 and 28S rRNA combined with in vitro PCR amplification and sequencing, in addition to conventional blood culture laboratory techniques. Nineteen of the samples were associated with positive blood cultures. Eubacterial (16S rRNA) PCR detected bacterial DNA in 26 febrile episodes, i.e. in an additional seven febrile episodes than blood-culture alone. The species identified by partial 16S Rrna gene sequencing were as follows Staphylococcus spp (n=6), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n=5), Acinetobacter spp (n=5), Escherichia coli (n=2), Enterobacter agglomerans (n=2), Campylobacter spp (n=1), Citrobacter spp (n=1), Corynebacterium spp (n=1), Enterobacter faecium (n=1), Ralstonia spp (n=1), Acidovorax spp. (n=1) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n=1). Gram-positive bacteria were found in 12/27 (44.6%) and Gram-negative bacteria were found in 15/27 (55.6%). After optimization of a PCR-based fungal detection method, none of the febrile episodes were shown to be attributable to fungi. The results of this study suggest that fungi are not common causal agents of febrile episodes in patients with a haematological malignancy at this centre and that molecular techniques can augment cultural methods in the diagnosis of causal agents of bacteraemia in patients, so that appropriate antibiotic regimens may be commenced in patients with culture-negative episodes of infection.

This report presents a case of endocarditis due to Haemophilus segnis, which represents a speciation difficulty for the routine laboratory. In this study, a molecular approach provided speciation, which was confirmed phenotypically by a reference laboratory. The use of molecular genotypic analysis is an additional strategy in the investigation of endocarditis. It has applications not only in isolate identification but also in primary detection of infection, particularly in patients whose blood is culture negative by conventional methodologies.

B.C. MILLAR, J. E. MOORE, J. XU, M. J. WALKER, S. HEDDERWICK AND R. MCMULLAN. 2002. Aims: To determine the frequency, distribution and association of genotypes of Candida albicans and C. dubliniensis in invasive and noninvasive clinical isolates. Methods: Twenty-one invasive and 18 noninvasive isolates were examined by PCR amplification of a transposable intron region in the 25S rRNA gene. Isolates were genotyped following analysis of the size of resulting DNA amplicons. The isolates could be subdivided into four genotypes (A-D). Results: There was no significant difference between the frequency and genotype distribution of the invasive and noninvasive Candida isolates. Impact of the Study: Therapeutic prophylaxis against candidal infections remains an area of controversy. Any diagnostic markers that reflect the potential of isolates to become invasive should be fully explored, so that more focused antifungal intervention should be targeted at these patients with these potential invasive markers. This study demonstrated that analysis of the transposable intron region in the 25S rRNA gene may be useful in helping to differentiate C. albicans from C. dubliniensis isolates, without the need for sequence analysis, which may not be readily available at primary diagnostic laboratories. However, employment of this genotypic assay is not a suitable locus to determine invasiveness and other more reliable markers of invasiveness should be sought.

J. XU, B.C. MILLAR, J. E. MOORE, K. MURPHY, H. WEBB, A. J. FOX, M. CAFFERKEY AND M. J. CROWE. 2003. Aims: The aim of this study was to develop a polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) method for the rapid separation of 16S rRNA PCR amplicons from aetiological agents of acute meningitis. Methods and Results: Blood samples from 40 patients with suspected acute meningococcal meningitis were examined for the presence of causal agents, including Neisseria meningitidis employing two methods: (i) broad-range 16S rRNA PCR in conjunction with PAGE and automated sequencing and (ii) species-specific PCR employing ABI TaqMan technology for N. meningitidis. Analysis of clinical specimens employing 16S rRNA PCR yielded 33/40 (82•5%) positive for the presence of bacterial DNA. Species-specific PCR yielded 30/40 (75%) clinical specimens positive for N. meningitidis. Prior to separation by PAGE, only 6/33 (18•2%) amplicons were able to be identified by sequence analysis, the remaining amplicons (n=27) did not yield an identification due to the presence of mixed 16S rRNA PCR amplicons. Following separation, amplicons were re-amplified and sequenced, yielding 24/27 (88•9%) positive for N. meningitidis and three specimens positive for Acinetobacter sp., Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. One specimen was positive for both N. meningitidis and Streptococcus spp. and another specimen was positive for N. meningitidis and Pseudomonas sp., by broad-range PCR. Seven clinical specimens were negative for N. meningitidis and other eubacteria using both detection techniques. Conclusions: Clinical specimens including blood and cerebrospinal fluid from patients with suspected acute bacterial meningitis, may become contaminated with commensal skin flora, resulting in difficulties in downstream sequencing of pathogen plus contaminant DNA. This study allows for the rapid separation of amplified pathogen　from contaminant DNA. Significance and Impact of Study: This study demonstrated the usefulness of the rapid separation of multiple 16S rRNA PCR amplicons using a combination of PAGE and automated sequencing, without the need of cloning. Adoption of this technique is therefore proposed when trying to rapidly identify pathogens in clinical specimens employing broad-range 16S rRNA PCR.

To employ partial 16S rDNA PCR and automated sequencing technique to identify non-culturable causal agents of bacterial meningitis, 73 peripheral blood samples and 413 culture-negative and eight culture-positive CSF clinical specimens from patients with suspected acute meningitis were examined for the presence of bacterial genomic DNA employing broad range 16S rDNA PCR followed by sequencing of the amplicons. In blood samples, 63/73 specimens were PCR positive (86.3%) and after direct sequencing of the PCR amplicons, only 12.7% (8/63) gave clear sequencing results and 55/63 (87.3%) were mixed with more than one organism detected. The mixed PCR amplicons were separated by using PAGE and mixed amplicons from 29/55 (52.7%) specimens were successfully identified through sequencing. Of the CSF samples, 8/8 culture-positive samples were also PCR positive and 45/413 (10.9%) of culture-negative gave a strong PCR signal and 88/413 (21.3%) specimens yielded a weak PCR signal. The remaining 280 culture-negative specimens were also PCR negative. Nested PCR was set up for the 88 weak positive samples and yielded 72/88 (81.8%) strong positives, with the remainder failing to amplify 133/413 (32.2%) culture-negative samples were PCR positive. In this study, the most common bacteria identified from blood specimens were Neisseria meningitidis, 13/63 (20.6%); Streptococcus spp, 5/63 (7.9%); Acinetobacter spp and Pseudomonas spp 4/63 (6.3%). From culture-negative CSF, the pattern was different in that Staphylococcus spp (13/58, 22.4%), Neisseria meningitidis (9/58, 15.52%) and Pseudomonas spp (8/58, 14.79%), were the most frequent. Overall, 16S rRNA broad-range PCR combined with direct DNA sequencing is a valuable molecular tool to aid with the detection as well as identification of non-culturable aetiological agents of acute bacterial meningitis and can augment cultural methods in the diagnosis of central nervous system infections in patients who have been treated with antibiotics. However, this study demonstrates that contamination is an important complication of the molecular assay, which should be attempted to be eliminated through careful laboratory controls. Hence there should be careful interpretation of any molecular finding, in tandem with other laboratory findings, such as culture, immunological and biochemical markers, and the clinical scenario of the patient.