An easy, simple, and highly efficient on-line preconcentration method for acidic compounds in capillary electrophoresis was investigated. It combined two on-line concentration techniques, field-amplified sample injection (FASI) and sweeping. A low-pH (2.5) background electrolyte was used to suppress the electroosmotic flow (EOF), obviating the need of a coated capillary, as well as to neutralize the weakly acidic analytes. After injection of a plug of water inside the separation capillary, negative voltage was applied to initialize FASI for a much longer time than usual. The anions experienced a high electric field and moved quickly to the boundary of the water and the low-pH nonmicellar electrolyte. When the anions encountered the low-pH electrolyte, they were neutralized and a focused sample zone was formed. Then both inlet and outlet vials were changed to those Containing the lowp Hmicellar background electrolyte. As negative voltage was applied, the anionic micelles moved into the capillary, and sweeping and separation began. The novelty in the present procedure is that a low-pH buffer is used to suppress the EOF and also the ionization of the analytes, without need of any other additives or use of a coated capillary. This method afforded 100 000-fold improvement in peak heights for some phenoxy acidic herbicides. The detection limits for these compounds could be low as 100pg/mL.

A procedure that combines two common stacking techniques, field-amplified sample injection and water removal, with an electroosmotic flow pump, is used to separate phenoxy acid herbicides by capillary zone electrophoresis. Before sample loading, a long plug of water was hydrodynamically injected into the capillary both to serve as the medium to permit a high electric field strength and to contain sample anions. Because of this long length of water, the number of ions injected into the capillary was greatly increased. Electrokinetic injection at reversed voltage was then used for introducing negatively charged ions from the diluted sample into the column. The water was removed from the capillary using the electroosmotic flow (EOF) pump when the EOF of the background electrolyte was suppressed. This method afforded a sensitivity enhancement of greater than 3000 times. Combined with solid-phase extraction, detection limits for the phenoxy acid herbicides as low as 0.01ng/mL could be achieved.

A preconcentration technique, which involves liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction, was developed to determine phenoxy herbicides in bovine milk. A layer of organic phase was impregnated into the pores of a 3.5cm long porous hollow fiber, while the internal volume of the fiber was filled with NaOH solution (the acceptor solution) that was connected directly to the needle of a microsyringe. The fiber was then immersed into 8ml of acidified milk sample. When the sample solution was stirred, acidic analytes were extracted into the organic phase and back extracted simultaneously into the alkaline acceptor medium as the analytes were protonated at low pH and deprotonated at high pH. After extracting for a prescribed time, 5ml acceptor solution was taken back into the syringe and injected directly into a HPLC system for quantification. The analytes were extracted quantitatively from the sample solution into the acceptor solution with a large enrichment factor of 900. Due to its low cost, the hollow-fiber extraction device was disposed of after a single extraction that eliminated the possibility of carry over effects. In addition, because a small volume of organic solvent was required and little waste is generated, the procedure is environmentally friendly, and is compatible with the "green chemistry" concept.

A simple liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction device utilizing a 2cm 30.6mm I.D. hollow fiber membrane was used to preconcentrate nitrophenols from water sample prior to capillary liquid chromatography (cLC) analysis. The extraction procedure was induced by the pH difference inside and outside the hollow fiber. The donor phase outside the hollow fiber was adjusted to pH～1 with HCl; the acceptor phase was NaOH solution used at various concentrations. Organic solvent was immobilized into the pores of the hollow fiber. With stirring, the neutral nitrophenols outside the fiber were extracted into the organic solvent, then back extracted into 2ml of basic acceptor solution inside the fiber. The acceptor phase was then withdrawn into a microsyringe and injected into the cLC system directly. This technique used a low-cost disposable extraction "device" and is very convenient to operate. Up to 380-fold enrichment of analytes could be achieved. This procedure could also serve as a sample clean-up step because large molecules and basic compounds were not extracted into the acceptor phase. The RSD (n56) was less than 6.2%, while the linear calibration range was from 1 to 200 mg/ml with r.0.998. The procedure was applied to the analysis of seawater.

Liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction (LLLME) with hollow fibers in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been applied as a rapid and sensitive quantitative method for the detection of four aromatic amines (3-nitroaniline, 4-chloroaniline, 4-bromoaniline and 3,4-dichloroaniline) in environmental water samples. The preconcentration procedure was induced by the pH difference inside and outside the hollow fiber. The target compounds were extracted from 4-ml aqueous sample (donor solution, pH～13) through a microfilm of organic solvent (di-n-hexyl ether), immobilized in the pores of a hollow fiber (1.5cm length 30.6mm I.D.), and finally into 4 ml of acid acceptor solution inside the fiber. After a prescribed period of time, the acceptor solution inside the fiber was withdrawn into the microsyringe and directly injected into the HPLC system for analysis. Factors relevant to the extraction procedure were studied. Up to 500-fold enrichment of analytes could be obtained under the optimized conditions (donor solution: 0.1M sodium hydroxide solution with 20% sodium chloride and 2% acetone; organic phase: di-n-hexyl ether; acceptor solution: 0.5M hydrochloric acid and 500μM 18-crown-6 ether; extraction time of 30min; stirring at 1000rev./min). The procedure also served as a sample clean-up step. The influence of humic acid on the extraction efficiency was also investigated, and more than 85% relative recoveries of the analytes at two different concentrations (20 and 100mg/l) were achieved at various concentration of humic acid. This technique is a low cost, simple and fast approach to the analysis of polar compounds in aqueous samples.